Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Car drives over cliff near Brighton



KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
19,791
Wolsingham, County Durham
Anyone know who this was and if so, can I have his lottery numbers?

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-sussex-27009338

[h=1]Brighton motorist survives 80ft cliff fall into the sea[/h]A man has survived an 80ft (24m) cliff fall after his car left the road and plunged into the sea near Brighton.
The 33-year-old suffered minor injuries and was able to get out of the Ford Focus and make his way to the rocks.
Newhaven Coastguard said his car had "miraculously" managed to clear the Undercliff promenade after leaving the A259 at Roedean shortly after midnight.
The man was brought up from the beach on a stretcher by emergency teams using specialist cliff rescue equipment.
A coastguard spokesman said: "A second ladder was installed to use as a slipway and the casualty was secured into Newhaven Coastguards rescue stretcher and then using some of our cliff rescue equipment we were able to slide the stretcher up the ladders.
"With nine members of various agencies on the three ropes and two of the Newhaven team at the top of the ladder we were able to bring the casualty up from the beach where he was handed into the care of paramedics."
He said a member of the Brighton lifeboat crew who had swum ashore in a dry suit also inspected the vehicle to see if there were any passengers.
Brighton and Newhaven lifeboat crews also searched the sea, while two coastguard teams searched the beach, but there were no other casualties.
Sussex Police, the South East Coast Ambulance Service, Newhaven Coastguard and East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service were among those who also helped rescue the man.
The spokesman said: "With approximately 22 emergency service workers from various agencies as well as two lifeboat crews this was fantastic team work leading to a swift extraction of the casualty."
The car was later recovered and the cause of the incident is under investigation.
 








vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,886
He must have been going a fair lick to get that far out. Lucky the tide was in otherwise he'd be crab food.
 






albionite

Well-known member
May 20, 2009
2,753
I run there, near Roedean, and it worries me that if a car has a tyre blow out, it could easily leave the road and carry me into oblivion :ohmy:

Isn't there a ditch/ little embankment between the road and cliff to stop that. Can't really see anyone driving from the road to over the cliff unless they was trying too.( if the case he was trying to top himself he should of found out the high tides)
 


Se20

Banned
Oct 3, 2012
3,981
Is wasn't the Judge was it ?

Should have gone left gone left, but he went right went right ???
 


Spun Cuppa

Thanks Greens :(
Isn't there a ditch/ little embankment between the road and cliff to stop that. Can't really see anyone driving from the road to over the cliff unless they was trying too.( if the case he was trying to top himself he should of found out the high tides)

The path is right next to the road, with a small bank that wouldn't stop a car/lorry/bus veering off the road at 50 mph :ohmy:
 




Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
19,835
Playing snooker
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.
 








Shropshire Seagull

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2004
8,496
Telford
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.

Don't want to undermine the good work the emergency services perform, but when there is an unusual incident of this nature, I suspect any available units in the area pop over to see if they can assist [a cynic might call them professional rubberneckers].
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,886
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.

I think the tide was in which would have softened the impact a little, looks relatively undamaged given the fall.
 


maltaseagull

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
12,986
Zabbar- Malta
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.

Also looking at the photo of the recovery vehicle lifting the car onto the undercliff, surely the rescue teams didn't need ladders to slide him on a stretcher up the cliff?
Bit of showboating IMO. Glad he is ok mind :)
 




Vegas Seagull

New member
Jul 10, 2009
7,782
That is what the word miracle is saved for. Looks like he landed on the sloping shingle beach at the same angle a ski jumper would...as David Coleman would say 'quite remarkable'
 


Spicy

We're going up.
Dec 18, 2003
6,038
London
How do you explain that one to the insurance company, i.e. will it affect my No claims Bonus?
 


Seagull over Canaryland

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2011
3,549
Norfolk
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.

I agree from the pattern of the impact it looks like the driver had a miraculous escape courtesy of the boot taking the bigger impact, rather than pancaking flat if had landed roof down.

The photos give a very simple view of the scene 'post incident' but as Bry Nylon should know when the initial 999 calls were received by each of the agencies reporting a car over the cliff edge and impacting into the sea with someone inside they would have (correctly) mobilised a very comprehensive and appropriate attendance. As it turns out most would probably have been stood down fairly promptly and made available for redeployment elsewhere. Normally these incidents are more involved and complicated by far more difficult access, unhelpful tides etc. and can be very resource intensive.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,288
That is what the word miracle is saved for.

no the word miracle is for where the supernatrual is necessary to explain. had his car having left the road been bounced gently away from the cliff edge by an unseen force field, that would have been a miracle. (or aliens)
 


edna krabappel

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,221
Looking at the car, it seems it landed on its boot, with the shingle cushioning the impact and the chap simply opened the door, got out and walked away. Lucky escape.

The Coastguard spokesman refers to a "swift extrication" of the casualty by a team of 22 Emergency service workers, plus two lifeboat crews - when earlier on in the piece it clearly states that the bloke walked away and made his way to the rocks. Certainly the car shows no evidence of any sort of casualty extrication. On that basis, 38 people involved in rescue operations for a one vehicle RTC seems like a slightly over-resourced incident to me.

You of all people should know that incidents are rarely as they appear to be from the initial 999 call.

What are they supposed to do? Say they won't bother until someone's updated from the scene that it's a nice easy job?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here