I was under the impression that the playing budget had been increased rather than cut, in spite of FFP restrictions.
As this is the fourth and fifth line:-I was under the impression that the playing budget had been increased rather than cut, in spite of FFP restrictions.
As this is the fourth and fifth line:-
Though the loss is a concern rather than disastrous, it shows how heavily former manager Gus Poyet was backed in the attempt to win promotion,
You can't expect the rest of the piece to be accurate.
No it's not, the lose incorporates a load of 'other' expenditure that would be prudent to put in the pre FFP balance sheet such as redundancies.That bit IS accurate!
No it's not, the lose incorporates a load of 'other' expenditure that would be prudent to put in the pre FFP balance sheet such as redundancies.
Blimey your Gus antenna must have been constantly buzzing since 3:30 yesterday.But Gus was backed heavily! And this did explain almost all of the loss increase.
Blimey your Gus antenna must have been constantly buzzing since 3:30 yesterday.
Gus wasn't given a £6.7 million 'war chest' to gain promotion with. (The difference between current, last and projected next loses)
But if you see it differently that's fine.
Like many others on NSC I have no intention of striking up a 'conversation' with you that involves the name Gus.
So, Gus went because he fell out with Barber? Hardly "gross misconduct"
WSC often carry insightful and accurate articles. This ain't one of them.
The author is an Albion fan, albeit an exiled one up in Yorkshire.
No it's not, the lose incorporates a load of 'other' expenditure that would be prudent to put in the pre FFP balance sheet such as redundancies.
But Gus was backed heavily! And this did explain almost all of the loss increase.
There's an explanation of the losses in the club programme tonight and I'm doing a longer one for the fanzine/blog.