worthingseagull123
Well-known member
- May 5, 2012
- 2,579
Ulloa is not worth 5 million.
we would be lucky to get half that.
we would be lucky to get half that.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Wickham recalled by Sunderland
- Thread starter Jimmy Grimble
- Start date
Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 8,708
Yes he is. Ulloa is quality and could easily play in the premier league. I would not take less than £5m for him. Especially given the inflated price that good strikers always command. Given a full season he is worth 20+goals in the championship and I'd reckon at least 15 in the premier league, so he would be an absolute steal at under £5million in my view.
Footsoldier
Banned
- May 26, 2013
- 2,904
Bloody hope you're right. That would be an absolute rubbish deal for us.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
This seems to be the most plausible reason.
Reinelt12
Sick Note
Didn't we turn that figure down from Palace in the summer?
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
The one thing that makes sense
Urchin
New member
- Aug 1, 2011
- 820
Yes.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,583
I have a feeling that at least two out of Bridcutt, Buckley and Ulloa won't be here in a week's time.
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
The fact that other clubs have previously bid for Buckley & Ulloa and there is plenty of interest in all 3; Sunderland would have to make a very appetising bid for us to see them all in 1 go. We'd get more selling each separately.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,583
I don't see why any respectable editor with their ear to the ground wouldn't be just as likely to pick up on these sort of rumours as the Sheffield paper.
armchairclubber
Well-known member
Agree, some excitable valuations on here seem to half the value of a possible target while doubling that of our own players
FWIW I'd value Wickham c.£5/6 m, Bridcutt £3/+.5 m, Buckley £2 m, Ulloa £3/+.5m ... would be quite happy if a swap were on the cards with £3.5 m coming our way. A long shot though.
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,221
I suspect you're probably correct in that hunch.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,287
Please not Leo
I will always thank Gus for what he did for the club but trying to sign 3 if our best players in January it's quite disrespectful in all honesty.
Spot on. He's annoying me now!
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
The Yorkshire Post isn't bothered by South Yorkshire when it's Leeds based.
Hungry Joe
SINNEN
Someone who can be bothered please tell them the feeling is mutual.
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
its called good business
3or4m =Wickham and them getting Bridders,Buckers and Leo
gives us some in the bank to spend on others players or just keep in the bank and get a class player who can it seems score at will in a very mid-table team
and if we could get Conway with some of that cash imagine to goals he could score
wehatepalace
Limbs
Sheffield Wednesday
Jimmy Grimble
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #99
As an aside, Wednesday lolol have had a bid rejected for Fryatt.
lolol have had a bid rejected for Fryatt.
Gritt23
New member
Disrespectful, or just doing his job?
Personally, I go for the latter.
Whenever we get a new manager, we are ALWAYS trawling through their former club(s) to try and identify who they will go back and get. So, why are so many people surprised when it happens the other way round?