Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Official MotM v Birmingham



Bozza

Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,719
Back in Sussex
What the hell happened there, the sponsors didn't give it to the bloke who scored. Isn't that the way it's supposed to work?
 




C

Cheeky Monkey

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
23,033
Should have gone to the linesman who missed one of our players (can't remember who) shoulder barge a Birmingham player off the pitch in the first half right in front of him and let play continue.
 


F

fleet

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
12,222
Encouraging to give it to a player who played well rather than the scorer! Should have been Crofts in my opinion, but KLL was certainly very close so a decent call.
 












H

HAILSHAM SEAGULL

Well-known member
Nov 9, 2009
10,347
martin tyler said:
Crofts was the man it shoukd have gone to. Been sensational all year. Going to be a massive miss
Click to expand...

Couldnt agree more, he was superb yesterday, definate MOM
 








F

Finchley Seagull

New member
Feb 25, 2004
6,916
North London
I would have given it to Crofts, just ahead of KLL. However, I could have understood it going to the goal scorer. Thought Lopez had a good game yesterday and in close games, his brilliant goal won us the game.

As I said in the player ratings, I thought they all played well yesterday except for Ulloa, who didn't look fit/bothered.
 






GM98

GM98

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2008
626
Shoreham
Before MOM was announced, I turned round to my mate and said MOM has to be Crofts today, and he agreed 2 votes for Crofts. Will be missed.
 


B

BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
HTML:
I thought it should have gone to Andrews as I thought that he was very good. With Crofts he doesnt appear to be doing a lot and catch the eye but we missed him when he went off. My brother and I remarked on how mant times Lua Lua went around the same player , kept the ball but didnt lose the defender this looks good but achieves little.
 




Luke93

Luke93

STAND OR FALL
Jun 23, 2013
5,030
Shoreham
Cheeky Monkey said:
Should have gone to the linesman who missed one of our players (can't remember who) shoulder barge a Birmingham player off the pitch in the first half right in front of him and let play continue.
Click to expand...

Was this the same linesman who didn't spot the ball going out of play before Burm gave away a corner?? The same linesmen who missed two blatant offsides from our players? The same linesmen who gave us a throw-in which we shouldn't of had??

Best linesmen all year, but we were due one.
 




surrey jim

surrey jim

Not in Surrey
Aug 2, 2005
18,093
Bevendean
drew said:
Second week running the scorer hasn't won it as March got it against Reading.
Click to expand...

Correct. There was a thread on here re the award. The match sponsor who chose posts on here (can't remember posters name now)

For yesterday's game Kaz should have got it IMO
 


H

hola gus

New member
Aug 8, 2010
1,797
BensGrandad said:
HTML:
I thought it should have gone to Andrews as I thought that he was very good. With Crofts he doesnt appear to be doing a lot and catch the eye but we missed him when he went off. My brother and I remarked on how mant times Lua Lua went around the same player , kept the ball but didnt lose the defender this looks good but achieves little.
Click to expand...

Have to agree with you. I thought Andrews was quality. Was generally surprised at his speed. Always thought he was a slow player. Kaz and Crofts were very good too but I would have gone with Andrews.
 








You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here