The Large One
Who's Next?
Conway was my MoM (i.e. he was least shite), so to take him off would have been even pottier than taking Barnes off. No point in having two forwards while taking away the width we desperately needed.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The "even though we were soft at the back to concede two, it's still Barnes' fault" thread
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
He did, but for me he is a luxury player, who when you are in a fight is not the type of player you need. Since he has joined I have yet to see him chase back and win possession having lost it in the first place. He is a clever player, but looks and probably is lacking fitness.
Oscar got it badly wrong by taking Barnes off, to me I would rather go down 3-1 fighting for an equaliser, rather than 'settle' for a 2-1 defeat.
BensGrandad
New member
My substitutions would have been:
Buckley for JFC
Agustein for Lopez
Lita for Crofts
This would have by passed the midfield, which had produced nothing all evening except rely on Brfidcutt to defend the back four and support the attack at least Bridcutt could have given the ball to Augustein to feed both Buckley and Conway out wide and then either of those or Agustein also to cross to Lita and Barnes in the goal area
Buckley for JFC
Agustein for Lopez
Lita for Crofts
This would have by passed the midfield, which had produced nothing all evening except rely on Brfidcutt to defend the back four and support the attack at least Bridcutt could have given the ball to Augustein to feed both Buckley and Conway out wide and then either of those or Agustein also to cross to Lita and Barnes in the goal area
Possibly. But I would never have brought on Agustein. It was crying for 4-4-2 or sacrifice Greer or Upson and go with three at the back.
Don't agree - as we then had Agustien and Buckley to play balls in. We needed two up top. Conway played alright, nothing special. Agustien was comfortably more incisive when he came on. All IMO, of course.
fat old seagull
New member
As our number 38 might have been if he hadn't been pressing his shorts in the dugout.
. Oh well, I still love my club and if we can't take the downs we wouldn't feel so good about the ups. 
Tubby-McFat-Fuc
Well-known member
Glad someone saw it! Thought he looked very useful. Can't understand some of the ratings for him......... well i can its NSC
Ulloah up front with those types of balls played in, are going to lead to some exciting times.
Was hoping we would see Leo last night. Lets keep our fingers crossed for Saturday.
Norman Potting
Well-known member
apparently at fault for the Leicester goal.
seagullsovergrimsby
#cpfctinpotclub
Can't even score a hat-trick against the top of the table side. Pah.
bluenitsuj
Listen to me!!!
Didnt even let anyone else take the penalty. So selfish.