Man of the match...

Trigger

Well-known member

Jul 4, 2003

40,457

Brighton

• Oct 2, 2013

• #1

Is it right to have a man of the match award when the team play as bad as that?...

Shouldn't it be like the lottery and have a rollover for the next game?

 

Hamilton

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jul 7, 2003

12,452

Brighton

• Oct 2, 2013

• #2

I thought Conway played well.

 

Mellotron

I've asked for soup

Jul 2, 2008

31,826

Brighton

• Oct 2, 2013

• #3

Ward was comfortably man of the match. He genuinely played well. Pretty much no one else did.

 

hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.

Helpful Moderator

Mar 16, 2005

61,261

Chandlers Ford

• Oct 2, 2013

• #4

Ward, Crofts and Andrews were all passable.

I did wonder whether the sponsors chose Kaz purely to wind up the Wednesday fans. I might have done that, in their shoes. Either that, or chose Agustien, so that I got to meet him, and tell him face to face what I thought of his 'performance'.

 

Hillian1

( . ) ( . )

Jul 15, 2010

15,364

Struggling for breath at the top of the stairs

• Oct 2, 2013

• #5

Maybe we should have "Man who was least shit of the match" award.

 

Norman Baker suck my lozenge

New member

Feb 24, 2004

6,638

Freshening up for the Ladies.

• Oct 2, 2013

• #6

If it was Fan of the match about 24 thousand whinging c@nts would have bottle champers.

 

countryman

Well-known member

Jun 28, 2011

1,893

• Oct 2, 2013

• #7

Mellotron said:

Ward was comfortably man of the match. He genuinely played well. Pretty much no one else did.

Click to expand...

I would have given it to ward. He may not be the fastest player but he kept winning the ball yesterday because of his persistence and in the first half he was probably the player that created the most chances.