If poyet gets the Sunderland job

pottert

New member

Aug 12, 2009

3,020

Peacehaven

• Sep 24, 2013

• #1

If gus gets the Sunderland job which I am not sure he will considering the similarities between his sacking & de canio's.

Will he try to prize bridcutt & Leo away from the Amex in January,I would be very suprised if he didn't.

 

P

portslade seagull

Well-known member

Jul 19, 2003

17,606

portslade

• Sep 24, 2013

• #2

They won't have enough money to put the offers in, not sure he will like that

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Sep 24, 2013

• #3

portslade seagull said:

They won't have enough money to put the offers in, not sure he will like that

Click to expand...

Isnt their owner a billionaire so money wouldnt be a problem.

 

pottert

New member

Aug 12, 2009

3,020

Peacehaven

• Sep 24, 2013

• Thread starter
• #4

portslade seagull said:

They won't have enough money to put the offers in, not sure he will like that

Click to expand...

Whoever gets the job will be given money in January.

 

Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat

Aug 18, 2009

65,437

Beside the seaside, beside the sea

• Sep 24, 2013

• #5

I can't see any similarities with the Di Canio sacking. It was because of a player revolt in his case.

 

symyjym

Banned

Nov 2, 2009

13,138

Brighton / Hove actually

• Sep 24, 2013

• #6

Thunder Bolt said:

I can't see any similarities with the Di Canio sacking. It was because of a player revolt in his case.

Click to expand...

Agree Di Canio was divorced during his honeymoon period, Gus was after a long marriage that started well.

 

S

Shropshire Seagull

Well-known member

Nov 5, 2004

8,496

Telford

• Sep 24, 2013

• #7

Does FFP mean that Sunderland have to sell some players first before buying anymore?
I thought the whole point of FFP was to stop the spend, spend, spend, mentality of some chairman / clubs?

 

kevtherev

Well-known member

Feb 28, 2008

10,448

Tunbridge Wells

• Sep 24, 2013

• #8

Sure I heard this morning that Sunderland were the 8th highest spenders in the league, I'm sure there will be some room for changes who ever goes there and money to spend in January.

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Sep 24, 2013

• #9

Shropshire Seagull said:

Does FFP mean that Sunderland have to sell some players first before buying anymore?
I thought the whole point of FFP was to stop the spend, spend, spend, mentality of some chairman / clubs?

Click to expand...

didn't I read that FFP doesn't apply in the Premier or am I wrong

 

symyjym

Banned

Nov 2, 2009

13,138

Brighton / Hove actually

• Sep 24, 2013

• #10

pottert said:

Will he try to prize bridcutt & Leo away from the Amex in January,I would be very suprised if he didn't.

Click to expand...

Would Bridcutt want to play for him again now that he has seen another way other than the Gus way?

Does Bridcutt want to just have a job of vacuum cleaner who must not pass forward, make forward runs, and is not allowed to shoot on sight?

I am sure he holds Gus in high regard but that doesn’t mean a working relationship would be a forward step for him if he is not permitted to express himself?

 

We're the Stripes

Well-known member

Jul 31, 2005

3,591

BN2

• Sep 24, 2013

• #11

Net spend of £2m this summer - not sure where this myth of them being big spenders comes from?* They won't be spending a combined £8m+ on two unproven Championship players in January, either.

*Under Di Canio, at least

 

M

Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member

Jul 27, 2004

9,796

saaf of the water

• Sep 24, 2013

• #12

The Manager doesn't chose who to buy at Sunderland.

 

G

Gwylan

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

31,336

Uffern

• Sep 24, 2013

• #13

As I said on the other thread, Sunderland spent big on 14 players in the summer. They weren't PDC's choices (which was part of the problem) but Roberto De Fanti's. I can't see any way that Sunderland would spend any serious money in January. Sunderland think they have the right players for the job and the manager has to work with them; if the board wouldn't allow PDC to get in the players he wanted, why would they allow Poyet?

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Sep 24, 2013

• #14

For years Sunderland were known as the Bank of England team due to their excessive spending but it didnt do them a lot of good

 

pottert

New member

Aug 12, 2009

3,020

Peacehaven

• Sep 24, 2013

• Thread starter
• #15

Thunder Bolt said:

I can't see any similarities with the Di Canio sacking. It was because of a player revolt in his case.

Click to expand...

The similarities are that they lost their jobs because of the way they acted off the pitch rather than what happened on it
(ie results)

 

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,695

Hurst Green

• Sep 24, 2013

• #16

BensGrandad said:

For years Sunderland were known as the Bank of England team due to their excessive spending but it didnt do them a lot of good

Click to expand...

Always had to pay good money just to entice players to go there.

 

pottert

New member

Aug 12, 2009

3,020

Peacehaven

• Sep 24, 2013

• Thread starter
• #17

PILTDOWN MAN said:

Always had to pay good money just to entice players to go there.

Click to expand...

Personal terms will not be the issue as they could offer far more than we could.

The transfer fees will be the biggest obstacle

 

Seagull73

Sienna's Heaven

Jul 26, 2003

3,382

Not Lewes

• Sep 24, 2013

• #18

symyjym said:

Would Bridcutt want to play for him again now that he has seen another way other than the Gus way?

Does Bridcutt want to just have a job of vacuum cleaner who must not pass forward, make forward runs, and is not allowed to shoot on sight?

I am sure he holds Gus in high regard but that doesn’t mean a working relationship would be a forward step for him if he is not permitted to express himself?

Click to expand...

And play in the Premier League with a bigger club than Brighton, and earn more money, and enhance his growing reputation on an international level, playing with and against better players week in, week out?

But hey, don't let your totally unjustified hatred and bias against Poyet stand in the way of cold hard facts will you?

 

wakeytom

New member

Apr 14, 2011

2,718

The Hacienda

• Sep 24, 2013

• #19

BensGrandad said:

Isnt their owner a billionaire so money wouldnt be a problem.

Click to expand...

Correct and I dont think FFP really exists in reality! Always ways around it didnt Chelsea's solicitors say on the same day upon hearing about it that they had already found a way for Roman to invest as much as he wanted in to the club?

 

symyjym

Banned

Nov 2, 2009

13,138

Brighton / Hove actually

• Sep 24, 2013

• #20

Seagull73 said:

And play in the Premier League with a bigger club than Brighton, and earn more money, and enhance his growing reputation on an international level, playing with and against better players week in, week out?

But hey, don't let your totally unjustified hatred and bias against Poyet stand in the way of cold hard facts will you?

Click to expand...

I don't hate Poyet and to say that is like the other side of the fence referring to others as Poyet lovers. Both are poor use in a debate.

None of us know what the players are thinking, and for all anyone knows Bridcutt may prefer the option of Norwich or Swansea or some other club in the Prem.

If Bridcutt thinks Poyet can further his career I would believe him, but we will find that out in time I am sure.

You have to understand though, that Bridcutt hasn't known anything different from Gus's way and he may well be more enlightened to a prefered coaching style and approach to play.