Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

How did Jeremy Forestt get 5 and a half years and Stuart Hall only a year??



Neil

Eastie
Aug 27, 2010
729
Langney
Stuart Hall went with a 9 year old plus others so why is Jeremy Forestt's sentence 5 times as big as Stuart Hall ??
 




Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,812
Lancing
OH NO :ffsparr:
 


hybrid_x

Banned
Jun 28, 2011
2,225
how did Neil not notice there is a thread already about this 5 times as big as this one?
 


Richard Tiltmans Shin Pad

Rustingtons' Mr Guiness
Jan 10, 2012
309
North Stand, Row Q
Ask Dougdeep. Or Hybrid X.
 
Last edited:


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,812
Lancing
I guess it was age and frailty which should not be a factor.
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
A guilty plea gets a discount because it means the victim & family don't have to face the trauma of a trial.
 


ali jenkins

Thanks to Guinness Dave
Feb 9, 2006
9,896
Southwick
Hall only got 15 months because that was the punishment at the time the offences were commited. If he had done it now then he would have got a lot longer
 






Brian Fantana

Well-known member
Oct 8, 2006
7,232
In the field
One case has nothing to do with the other and should not be compared, also the Hall sentence will rise

It is natural that people are going to compare the outcome of them both, given that they are both sexual cases. You can't really argue with the fact that it does look a bit odd that Hall's sentence was so comparatively light.
 








Bruno

New member
Jul 2, 2012
75
Hall only got 15 months because that was the punishment at the time the offences were commited. If he had done it now then he would have got a lot longer

So if someone had committed murder in say 1965 but through modern techniques in DNA they were only traced and convicted now, would they be hanged because that was the punishment when the crime was committed?
 








dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
So if someone had committed murder in say 1965 but through modern techniques in DNA they were only traced and convicted now, would they be hanged because that was the punishment when the crime was committed?

Good question sir.
 


Footsoldier

Banned
May 26, 2013
2,904
So if someone had committed murder in say 1965 but through modern techniques in DNA they were only traced and convicted now, would they be hanged because that was the punishment when the crime was committed?

Brilliant question. As a lot on here say the punishment for hall is because it was committed under laws back then, then I will love to see people hanged.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,854
Brighton
Stuart hall got a total of 114 months for 18 offences (different sentences for each count), but the sentence for each is being served concurrently (at the same time), with longest for any one offence being 15months, none of them being for having sex with a child (it was mostly over the clothes fondling), with the last offence being 25 years ago, no evidence of offence since then when he claimed he became celibate. http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/?news_id=33371


Forestt got a total of 22 years (4.5 years for each) for five counts of sex offences to be served concurrently, plus one year for one count of abduction to be served consecutively after the others). His offences were considered worse because he is a teacher, in a position of authority over her, having occurred more recently with no reason to believe he would not re-offend if he were allowed to remain free. http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/newsgallery/?news_id=33440
 


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Hall definitely got off too lightly. His actions with 18 girls might well have blighted 18 lives.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here