Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Bennett V Buckley
- Thread starter Neecha
- Start date
JamesAndTheGiantHead
Well-known member
Bennett was way more consistent and didn't seem so injury prone, and chipped in with a few belters as well, so Bennett.
nah...it's Buckley for me. So much potential there if he can get a little less injury prone
Who?
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
Buckley for me in spite of his inconsistency.
Bennett did all is good work against poor League one opponents and not proved himself enough against better opponents.
Bennett did all is good work against poor League one opponents and not proved himself enough against better opponents.
rcf0712
Out Here In The Perimeter
Buckley, he'd start for Norwich every week, massive talent which much more to come if we can sort his feckin hamstrings out. Bennett struggles to make the team at Norwich. I think Bennett looked so good for us because it was Division One football, he'd be great at Championship level but doesn't seem to have made it in the EPL yet from what little I can see form here, IMHO.
rcf0712
Out Here In The Perimeter
wow, we must have been typing the same thoughts at different ends of the earth simultaneously then, deep man......
dejavuatbtn
Well-known member
I fear that Buckley's build and lack of fitness will ultimately lead to the loss of his most valuable asset, speed. His crossing is generally poor. I think Bennet is still a better prospect for the championship and I don't think we need to concern ourselves with "premiership potential".
Farehamseagull
Solly March Fan Club
As much as I like Buckey, Bennett was one of my all time favourite Albion players so Bennett for me.
I loved watching him play, his passing, crossing and set set pieces were some of the best I've seen in the stripes. Great attitude also.
I loved watching him play, his passing, crossing and set set pieces were some of the best I've seen in the stripes. Great attitude also.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
When Buckley get's it right, he is unplayable.
People will say that's an overly dramatic statement for a player in the championship but he has the qualities that defenders hate. His turn of pace (especially for a tallish player), he is direct, and he can shoot. Of course, it's getting him on the pitch regularly which is the key.
This is one of the reasons I just can't panic about next season like others. Some of the quality we have in attacking areas for a new manager to play with is very exciting.
People will say that's an overly dramatic statement for a player in the championship but he has the qualities that defenders hate. His turn of pace (especially for a tallish player), he is direct, and he can shoot. Of course, it's getting him on the pitch regularly which is the key.
This is one of the reasons I just can't panic about next season like others. Some of the quality we have in attacking areas for a new manager to play with is very exciting.
beefypigeon
Well-known member
- Aug 14, 2008
- 960
Bennett is the better footballer, comfortably. He could also satisfy multiple positions; out wide, and centrally where he was most effective.
- Thread starter
- #16
They have different styles agreed but are both wingers by trade. get off the fence
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Exactly.
MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,723
Bennett.