A lesson for all.
Good for her. She should know better but apparently does not.
She annoys me greatly. Just because her husband is "something" she is determined to impose herself on the country too, as if she was important. I really couldn't care less what her thoughts are on anything.
It does show that for something to be libellous you don't need to state it - just make a reference to it or the person.
What's the point in using twitter if we can't say anything? Can we have a list of things we can say on twitter? I think I'm gonna give twitter a miss for a while since we can't talk about anything on there...
Well with Legal Aid being ripped up, along with the right for the poorest to choose their own defence, and replaced by Eddie Stobarts secondary legal business.This is going to be a massive growth area for the legal eagles, isn't it. I can see it now, the No Win / No Fee guys jumping all over this.
Every year, we have to put up with someone constantly putting themselves and also being put in the news - Pete Docherty, Amy Winehouse, Katie Price, Sally Bercow, that boy from One Direction. Does it make any of them happy?
Probably makes them a lot of money, though, and they get to feel important.
"Today's ruling should be seen as a warning to all social media users. Things can be held to be seriously defamatory, even when you do not intend them to be defamatory and do not make any express accusation. On this, I have learned my own lesson the hard way." says Sally Bercow. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-22652083