Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Margaret Thatcher Tax Snatcher?



Margaret Thatcher the tax snatcher? Mystery of her £6m house with links to THREE tax havens - Mirror Online

Margaret Thatcher the tax snatcher? Mystery of her £6m house with links to THREE tax havens
13 Apr 2013

Financial experts said it could have been a scheme which would help her estate avoid millions of pounds in inheritance tax

Margaret Thatcher’s £6m London townhouse is owned by a mysterious company with links to THREE notorious tax havens.

Financial experts said it could have been a scheme which would help her estate avoid millions of pounds in inheritance tax.

But because her affairs are shrouded in such extraordinary secrecy it may be impossible to find out.

The trail leads to offshore businesses in the British Virgin Islands with links to Liechtenstein and Jersey.

The £6million property she lived in for more than 20 years is owned by Bakeland Property Company, based in the BVI.

The company’s official address is a PO Box in a small town in Liechtenstein and it had its original roots in St Helier, Jersey.

Any suggestion of avoiding a £2.4m inheritance tax bill will spark outrage following the row over who is paying for Thatcher’s lavish £10m funeral.

And John Christensen, of the Tax Justice Network, said: “How can a former prime minister spend more than two decades living in a house in London that has been owned for many years by a company based in the British Virgin Islands?

“This does not pass the smell test and simply cannot be allowed to happen in 21st Century Britain.

"We all have a duty to pay our taxes, and that includes former politicians.

"Politicians and in particular prime ministers have a duty to be transparent with their financial affairs.”

Records at the government’s Land Registry HQ in Croydon, South London showed that on March 29, 2006, Bakeland paid £2,395,807 for the house at Chester Square in Belgravia, London.

It is unclear who they purchased the house from because they were also named on the lease when the house was originally bought on October 30, 1991 for a reported £700,000 in 1991.

There are two leases on the property, which a Land Registry source described as “unusual”.

The first one was taken out on October 18, 1991, and lasts until December 25, 2030.

The second was taken out on July 29 and runs out in 2055.

The latest lease mysteriously stated: “The airspace above the building is excluded from the title.”

The trail: Ownership criss-crosses the globe

Bakeland Property Company Ltd trustees were originally listed as Jersey-based Hugh Thurston and Leonard Day, her friends and financial advisers.

In 2002 The Guardian reported that Bakeland’s shares were held by Mr Day and Mr Thurston.

Accountants said they were acting as nominees for a trust with concealed beneficiaries.

As Lady Thatcher did not own the house herself it is possible, depending on the terms of her will, that her children Mark and Carol could benefit.

If the property was listed in the name of their mother they would been subject to 40% tax on the entire value of the home – an estimated £2.4m.

Both Mark and Carol visited the house in Chester Square last night.

Tax campaigner Mr Christensen added: “There are huge financial benefits for an offshore company to own a property or leasehold particulaly in connection with stamp duty and inheritance tax.

“A company doesn’t die. If a person dies the property has to be passed on to someone else – obviously this is not the case with a company.

“This can be very beneficial indeed and can save a large amount of money in taxes which would be othewise due.”

The Mirror called the British Virgin Financial Services Commission which confirmed that the company which now owns Thatcher’s house had been based there since August 19, 2005.

The question marks over the Thatcher home come as police in London prepare for demos this weekend following the former Prime Minister’s death on Monday.

Anarchists threatened a mass “party” to celebrate her death and protesters say a demonstration in Trafalgar Square today will be a focus for discontent in the run-up to Wednesday’s funeral.
 




Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
71,964
Living In a Box
Sadoldleftie.com at it again
 












HOFNSKIN

Active member
Feb 12, 2012
222
Just goes to show what bunch of arms dealing,gin swilling, tax advoiding, hypocritical *******s the Thatcher Family were, and still are.
 


Feb 14, 2010
4,932
I have kept out of this all and normally cannot stand the dumbed down nature of Question Time these days. However I listened to Ming Campbell on Question Time and it was a credit to him to recognise that at the time, he had got things wrong. I actually think Thatcher gets too much "credit" or "blame" depending on your view for the closure of failing industries. Also Thatcher did not despite what the press tell people close anything. She just refused to take money from the successful parts of the economy to give to the failing part of the economy and that is a completely different thing. As for this thread, well the real tax snatchers are the public sector run industries that will fight reform with every breath in their body. remember, a government has no money except other peoples and it is time that those charged with spending it looked at themselves as trustees of that money with the associated trustees duties. They also should understand that the tax pool is for the benefit of those that use the services and not the employees. Now that really would be a sea change in the attitude of our public sector.
 




Feb 3, 2013
398
And I dont see what is wrong with avoiding paying as little as possible in tax. People are moaning yet again about maggie but dont moan when these benifit familys take british tax payers to the cleaners.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,303
Inheritance tax is theft anyway. I'd be amazed if most people don't attempt to exploit loopholes.

this. be surprised if offshore accounts is necessary.
 


CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
44,772
And I dont see what is wrong with avoiding paying as little as possible in tax. People are moaning yet again about maggie but dont moan when these benifit familys take british tax payers to the cleaners.

You think it's okay for former Prime Ministers to avoid tax?
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Inheritance tax is theft anyway. I'd be amazed if most people don't attempt to exploit loopholes.

The level was set when homes were still relatively less expensive but has remained the same so that a lot of houses in the south east now fall into this bracket.
I have a cousin with one offspring who will have to pay inheritance tax when they die. It is not even a big house.
 








Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,419
In a pile of football shirts
I have kept out of this all and normally cannot stand the dumbed down nature of Question Time these days. However I listened to Ming Campbell on Question Time and it was a credit to him to recognise that at the time, he had got things wrong. I actually think Thatcher gets too much "credit" or "blame" depending on your view for the closure of failing industries. Also Thatcher did not despite what the press tell people close anything. She just refused to take money from the successful parts of the economy to give to the failing part of the economy and that is a completely different thing. As for this thread, well the real tax snatchers are the public sector run industries that will fight reform with every breath in their body. remember, a government has no money except other peoples and it is time that those charged with spending it looked at themselves as trustees of that money with the associated trustees duties. They also should understand that the tax pool is for the benefit of those that use the services and not the employees. Now that really would be a sea change in the attitude of our public sector.

Pretty sure I 100% agree with this, well said.
 










lighthouse

New member
Feb 27, 2008
744
north hampshire
You think it's okay for former Prime Ministers to avoid tax?

It is okay for anyone to avoid tax provided they do it legally. Whether it be a humble cash ISA or more complex offshore scheme, they are there to be used because our tax laws allow it. We live in a democracy - if we think certain tax avoidance schemes are unpalatable then our political leaders need to change tax legislation.

If people enter arrangements that are not legal, then hit them with the full force of law
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here