MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,733
Following on from a comment somewhere else on here today…
Well? Is it?
I’m not sure. If it is, doesn’t that mean that the team with the best attack will also have the best defence? Doesn’t it blur any distinction between stages of play?
I vote NO. I reckon CONSIDERED RISK is a better form of defence, though admittedly it's not as catchy.
Over to you, the great brainboxed intelligentsia of NSC.
Well? Is it?
I’m not sure. If it is, doesn’t that mean that the team with the best attack will also have the best defence? Doesn’t it blur any distinction between stages of play?
I vote NO. I reckon CONSIDERED RISK is a better form of defence, though admittedly it's not as catchy.
Over to you, the great brainboxed intelligentsia of NSC.