Cantona's Flying Dropkick
vidi vici veni
Kent won the toss and elected to bat
So far Kent 59/1 (8.3/40 ov)
So far Kent 59/1 (8.3/40 ov)
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Cricket] Clydesdale Bank 40, Group A: Sussex v Kent at Hove, Aug 23, 2011
- Thread starter Cantona's Flying Dropkick
- Start date
Cantona's Flying Dropkick
vidi vici veni
- Thread starter
- #2
Kent 63/2 (9.3/40 ov)
S'hampton Seagull
Well-known member
Not being sure how the Net run rate is calculated, is it possible for Middlesex to overhaul us at the top? They've got 1 game left and are 2 points behind.
Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
A team’s net run rate is calculated by deducting from the average runs per over scored by that team, the average runs per over scored against that team. In the event of a team being all out in less than its full quota of overs, the calculation of the net run rate of both teams shall be based on the full quota of overs to which the batting team would have been entitled and not on the number of overs in which the team was dismissed.
Only those matches where results are achieved will count for the purpose of net run rate calculations. Where a match is abandoned, but a result is achieved under Duckworth/Lewis, for net run rate purposes Team 1 will be accredited with Team 2’s Par Score on abandonment off the same number of overs faced by Team 2. Where a match is concluded but with Duckworth/Lewis having been applied at an earlier point in the match, Team 1 will be accredited with 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2 off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2 to reach the target.
Er... yes, maybe. Probably.
Only those matches where results are achieved will count for the purpose of net run rate calculations. Where a match is abandoned, but a result is achieved under Duckworth/Lewis, for net run rate purposes Team 1 will be accredited with Team 2’s Par Score on abandonment off the same number of overs faced by Team 2. Where a match is concluded but with Duckworth/Lewis having been applied at an earlier point in the match, Team 1 will be accredited with 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2 off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2 to reach the target.
Er... yes, maybe. Probably.
SockMonster
Well-known member
Of course. Obvious really.
larus
Well-known member
Kent 137/4 (22.2/40 ov)
larus
Well-known member
Kent 151/5 (25.2/40 ov)
sams dad
I hate Palarse
Kent 216 a o
Sussex 17 - 0
Sussex 17 - 0
Cypriot-Seagull
Well-known member
sussex lose 4 wickets for only 7 runs! maybe this match is so one sided after all. Hope Yardy and Gatting can put up a good partnership now.
86/4 16 overs
86/4 16 overs
JCL - the new kid in town
New member
- Aug 23, 2011
- 1,864
Why can't they bat this season?
Paxton Dazo
Up The Spurs.
- Mar 11, 2007
- 9,719
We lost it when Gatting got run out. We're still in the Semi's, but I wanted a home-tie in the Semi's but that doesn't look like happening.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
Now we know.
The Large One
Who's Next?
Listen to this week's Albion Roar with Sussex CCC chief executive, Zac Toumazi.