But as usual has failed to state what definitive evidence is, many might say that the UK security services verdict is definitive evidence. But Jeremy says different, again.
He would not condemn Russia over Salisbury. He actively supported Sinn Fein.
Credible in the Gulf equals Iranian threats, video of Iranian vessels alongside the tankers, and UK not US security services blaming Iran.
But Jeremy says different.
You really are a complete idiot.
You no doubt keep defending the indefensible, Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong supporter of the other side, whoever it is. Would probably side with Mars if there was a nuclear war with Earth.
Blair believed he was doing the right thing, cannot ask any more of a man than that. Corbyn being right is quite possible in a moral sense, but being capable of being a leader of one of the biggest economies in the world requires pragmatism, the man is not capable of that.
So, what gives you...
But as a potential PM he may have an effect on my pension(s), my family, my friends, my future, plus I can still vote in all UK elections. So up yours! :lol:
From commercial experience I can categorically state that using Marine Traffic and other freely available websites to track shipping through the Gulf is about as reliable as Michael Fish and hurricane forecasts. Tracking equipment is routinely turned off to avoid pirate vessels. I have tracked...
After Iran threatening to disrupt oil tankers through the Gulf, after being linked with four attacks in May, with video footage released to the press, with crew being ‘put up’ in Iran, and the UKs own security services (not the Yanks) saying Iran did it, maybe JC might like to be less...
IRA, Hamas, PLO, Saddam, Ghadaffi, etc etc, and even now when he is as close to power as he has ever been, this......
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48645280