Search results

Does that mean we get bigger puddings?

Fair call, but until that actually is discussed and agreed upon, I would like to keep our own big stick.

We would have the protection of a weakened NATO.

Obviously there is, but the non proliferation treaty allows these nations to obtain that protection whilst not investing in the same technology. Do you suggest that ALL in NATO give that advantage away, leading to Russia, USA, China and Israel having the ace cards?

Probably get banned for that level of insults soon. Wouldn't happen in Germany, or 10 years ago on NSC.

So you do not think that NATO is stronger as a body of many?

So according to Ms Church we should asdk the Syrian people who they want us to bomb. Would that be those under the rule of ISIS, or those under the rule of Assad? Very polarised answers I would imagine. Alternatively we could blame climate change? Well done Charlotte :facepalm:

All under the umbrella of NATO you buffoon.

Charlotte Church matching her image of a dumb blonde perfectly. 'The issue of Trident renewal is a completely different issue than that of JC's refusal to push the button', not verbatim but the essence of. Just a celebrity idiot trying to reinvent herself.