Search results

And perhaps get a discharge, and no order for costs? Seems far too sensible, especially for football.

C'mon, common sense should prevail? My figures were hypothetical, but if they were anywhere near accurate, then surely the answer is blindingly obvious.

It was entirely hypothetical, see post #78

Post #77, keep up dear chap.

495 didn't laugh at, or abuse the perpetrator (sp) of the stabbing.. They also believe the prosecution would be in the public interest. Yours, is the totally spurious argument.

25,000 people? In all probability 24,500 dib not even see the alleged gesture, 300 just laughed, 195 threw more abuse back at CKR, 5 were offended, 1 screamed for a policeman! Now which group are more important? In a democracy you could wrongly say those that did not see the gesture, in...

SENSITIVE soul alert.

Funnily enough, no I don't. Not in the public interest, waste of police time, a warning should be issued.