Search results

I will let you get out, I need to too, we can come back to this later, but Buckley would have made an impact sub for 20 mins before being helped of the pitch putting us down to 10 men. I wil give you that Buckley may have lasted more than 20 mins as an impact sub, but it would have been at a...

:lolol: :shrug:

There is plenty of evidence that Buckley and Orlandi get injured easily and would have been gamble substitutions that could put us down to 9 men :shrug: If you cannot even agree with that I am wasting my time.

But you cannot use two injury prone and unfit players (Buckley, Orlandi) as impact subs, they had to start or play no part at all. The reason for this is that if Buckley and Orlandi came on as subs and broke down after 20-30 mins, which was very highly likely, we would be down to 9 men. Oscar...

So in this scenario Buckley and Orlandi shouldn't have made the bench, because of their injury issues it would have been a gamble to bring them on as subs. So your starting line up and bench would have been as below; 29 Kuszczak 14 Calderón 17 Ward 38 Ince 03 Greer...

We started the game with the same team that gave Derby the run around in the first leg, minus Upson. Even Derby fans thought we out played them. Buckley was the star of the show in the first half of the first game but carried his injury into the second, and Orlandi wasn't fit to play 90 mins so...

Yep, his last question was about strengthening in the summer market, and his reply was "ask the club" classic really :lolol: respect to him.