Search results

I get that (although it doesn’t look like we’ll get that point). But the issue is the contradiction in the article which leads me to think it’s a bit rubbish.

The article doesn’t really say anything of any note or interest at all. A child could’ve basically written it. It’s basicslly just a summary that says Hughton plus players = good. There’s no analysis at all. And who predicted us to finish 10th at the start of the season? Were they high? And if...