Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. studio150

    Q for the history buffs: Monte Cassino - anyone been?

    Wasn't it also the reluctance to go around Cassino in the race to Rome that partly contributed to the number of attacks and casualties.
  2. studio150

    Q for the history buffs: Monte Cassino - anyone been?

    So 75000 casualties compared to just under 2 million killed injured or captured in Stalingrad where every inch of ground was thought over. War is never pleasant but preserved sites war graves and battle grounds do illustrate that we should avoid armed conflict when ever possible
  3. studio150

    Q for the history buffs: Monte Cassino - anyone been?

    Why would some say, the Americans I assume.
  4. studio150

    Q for the history buffs: Monte Cassino - anyone been?

    Stalingrad would have been harder fought by some distance I would suggest.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here