Search results

Maybe he's trying to say he's seen DKs member?

You said... implying more than one... ...our survey said...

In MY world? Are you accusing ME of living in a world that isn't the reality? :D If you have no evidence, I'm afraid we've reached a bit of an impasse. It was nice of you though to recognise that maybe, just maybe, DW and BL have some input into our choice of players.

So you have NO evidence then?

Can you point me in the way of evidence which suggests that i) DW wanted to keep Savage, Hammond and O'Callaghan and DK didn't. ii) DK wanted to sign Murray, Thompson, whoever else the 3rd one is meant to be, and DW didn't. Ta :thumbsup:

I've got to say this is a really good wind up, I'm impressed you are still going. The highlighted parts shows that you actually have no idea; you are supposing (for no clear reason that I can see) that in fact Thompson, Murray and the rest are all now on wages that break the wage structure...

:thud: I am not talking about the overall budget. As I said, the amount spend may well be the same. The difference is the players positions within the wage heirarchy of the club. I'm going to make up some numbers to make my point, so bear with me. Bas Savage wants £2k a week; DK says 'okay we...

What do you know though, Buzzer? You're only a chartered accountant! :jester:

Wow. I've just spend my lunch hour reading this thread from the start, and can I just say WHAT A f***ing WASTE OF AN HOUR. Jesus. However, given that I'm new to the argument, and can't be bothered to do any work, I'll happily take up the 'debate'. BigGully, I was going to quote one of your big...