Search results

Depends how you interpret the question. It's not the worst player but the worst signing. I take that to mean that cost/ wages should be taken into account, a lot of the players you mention, atrocious as they were, were low risk signings. This is why CMS isn't a ridiculous answer as we spent an...

Good point. :lolol:

What's not even hitting a second goal, on top of the exisiting goal? A conversion, I think they call it in rugby.

This is worst signing rather than worst player so taking into account overall contribution vs money spent I nominate Kemy Agustein. I shudder to think what we've wasted on this big lump of useless's wages. Clearly a talented player but has absolutely no desire to even pretend like he's a...