Can I just ask. If a club is struggling and the squad looks poor to previous seasons, how much of the responsibility is attributed between the manager and the DOF. Is it 50-50 or what, if the team is failing why is the head of the manager only ever called for?
Surely that is not what Butterball means is it? A new manager comes in because the previous manager and players failed. Now my issue is, although the previous manager in the eyes of the club failed, how much of the failure is down to the DOF, who identified the the poor players that let the club...