Why is it then that HIS opinion seems to be less valid than yours? Why dont you, and the likes of Silk just focus on supporting your own position in this argument/debate, instead of concentrating solely on discrediting and abusing any individual who happens to offer a contra-opinion.
So if you 'get lucky' and win some cash on the lottery, or even if you inherit someones estate,.... are you going to put your money where your mouth is ( no pun intended), and only retain what you reasonably need and distribute the rest ot those in need around the globe?
....and these exceptions only happen when Labour are not in power, .. I see where you are coming from now, however its not a place I fancy going myself.
PS: ... and how common a misconception does it have to be, to actually be true?
Indeed it would, I cannot argue with your statement.... but that strategy and outcome, I feel, is based on a stable internal workforce, not the largely new transient workforce we are trying to accommodate aswell.
Come on Edna, you don't normally sit on the fence,.... you must have a view... it wouldn't be a proper NSC thread without a pointed comment or two from 'Her Majesty'.
What a crock of BS,..... the low paying jobs are paid at that low level BECAUSE there is an endless supply of EU 'economic' migrants to fill the void, who don't have geographical and family commitments to an area, or indeed economical commitments to pay rent, run a car, raise a family, LIVE A...
What proportion I wonder, are formed from the much discussed migrant communities seen developing here since the new membership nations joined. A documentary I saw recently highlighted that the food banks run by charities in London in particular, were being overwhelmed by mostly migrant groups...