Search results

Pedantry is a really poor response, you do specialise in it, well that and being patronising. However, I will leave you to stew now, I have work to do, and I feel I have made my points, no need to flog a dead one.

I can't see how anarchy\abolish politics is going to miraculously contribute to the clawing back of said 'squillions',..............I also don't or wont argue that papers in general consider themselves above the law\system\government..... its the nature if the beast, we want them to ask the hard...

Of course, papers live and die by the validity or otherwise of the stories they print and methods they use to get them.........its called free speech, its called a free press.......if they cock up that's fine, they pay whatever price is due. All my comments, are simply saying that those...

I certainly don't think she did support or promote it either, nor does the paper I suspect,.......but just as the Guardian would jump on a Conservative politician in the same circumstances, the Mail is making mischief....its their job.

Seem?.....

Of course, therefore, the questions directed at someone with ANY sort of links to such a heinous group, whoever is asking the questions, are surely right and proper..... surely?

.......or is it simply that the target has Labour associations, if it was a politician of the 'blue team' would you have the same enthusiasm to doubt the message or the messenger?

Yawn.......history eh!?!?..... I simply offered advise for the post in an effort to help him get an answer. I don't read the Mail......I read the Indie.... always have done.....

Ask Harriet Harman and Liberty,... they seemed to have a vested interest at some point historically.