Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    no-one is challenging what the law says but rather that it was a split second from being a challenge that took the ball and not the player - ill judged and dangerous but not malicious - 3 match ban not 7
  2. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    a three game ban is the punishment for a red card which is what he would have got had the ref had a clear sight of the incident. Calls for a ban for the rest of the season on here and in the media is a witch hunt that serves no purpose. It has however (very conveniently) got the Newcastle...
  3. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    I saw plenty of times where feet were raised at the Amex yesterday. Given the speed a game is played any one of those could have ended in a coming together and an injury. They didnt. They rarely do thankfully. When it does happen the player gets sent off (if spotted) and a three game ban. If not...
  4. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    :nono: :nono: :nono: Love it when daring to disagree draws immediate personal abuse. NSC at its best?
  5. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    ban tackling completely then :shrug:
  6. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    should be a three match ban but no more IMO
  7. S

    Callum McManaman (Wigan)...

    Bad bad tackle....no doubt.......but he did catch the ball first, if only with the tip of his boot, so some slight mitigation as an inch lower and his foot would never have followed through to the guy's knee. Nothing to indicate it was deliberate still less malicious Martinez said in his...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top