Search results

I don't either, but anything that dictates that a business would have to reduce an employees salary by half is likely to be on shaky ground.

It would have to be a rule; however I think it would not be enforceable under UK employment law.

Coz it only takes one team to not do it.

Another huge THIS. FFP is actually coming in at a very good time or us. Not only ate we planing to live within our means for the first time in years, but we'll also be rewarded for it.

Particularly when the player (and their agent) knows full well that the club will be receiving parachute payments for 3 years. Like I alluded to: The future parachute payments are effectively spent in the first season when clubs sign a load of new players to try and make themselves competitive.

It's not easy to let go or loan out a failed premier league player with 2-3 years left on his lucrative contract; clubs that might want them aren't always going to match their current wages.

A good example to show that parachute payments don't mean automatic success with the millstone of a squad on premier league contracts hanging around a club's neck. QPR are another example. Fair enough, they look likely to go straight back up, but even with their parachute payments it seems to...