Search results

I know he'd be welcomed back. I'd cheer him on like everyone else but I still don't think he's what we need.

He's not a suitable replacement for Bakdock IMO. He's a no.10 and he is untried and untested as a striker, the position we actually need more depth in.

Yes - before the season got into full swing. Why change the formation now when we are second in the table?

Said it before and I'll say it again - I don't see the point in buying a no.10 when we play 4-4-2. Tex doesn't fit into CH's current system so unless he changes the system that has proven so effective it'd be a bit pointless. We need a pacey striker (an upgrade or an understudy for Baldock) not...