Search results

I don't want to be controversial......but I had doubts over the original 'down line' from Mancini. I have now drawn a perfectly straight line down from the starting point in the armpit. The line has not moved one pixel left or right (i checked).....and I come out with this. You can see my black...

Want evidence that I've well and truly lost my mind? Now watch as a man who doesn't have a clue what he's doing tries to blag something. Below is an image which I have taken the two lines we know to be true. The edge of the penalty box and the white line through the penalty spot. I wanted to...

That's why I've demonstrated the wiggle room to account for the fact that angle will change the nearer you get to the edge of the box. However the incident happened much nearer the penalty spot line than the edge of the box. Someone more intelligent than me will be able to work out the angle...

Just another view point. More than happy to be told why this is nonsense. I have taken your image above where you place dots for points of reference for VH and Mancini. In the first image below I have drawn a black line to follow the white line already on the pitch in your image. I have then...

I don't think he was offside. The lack of lines were just a coincidence. Not proof of a cock up. My apology is because this goes against the view that he was "clearly" offside,

I didn't draw the lines. Found it on X. The red line is in line with JPVH ankle as far as I see it and runs across the whole pitch. When tracking Mancinis upper body down to that line it is basically bang on. Not sure what the blue line in your image is. Certainly not in line with the furthest...

Angles my friend. Angles.

For what it's worth, I think he's onside. The angle is deceptive but I think he's on. Sorry.....

That's how a picture works. It shows you the thing.