Search results

I'm not sure it's exactly the point you're making, but the idea that everyone was doping so in a way it created a level playing field is nonsense. A great post on inrng.com about it: "There are some who say that because almost every overall contender in the Tour de France was doping it doesn’t...

The good thing here though is that isn't just about being busted for taking drugs - the much wider conspiracy and encouraging others to take drugs is what Lance will really struggle to squirm out of. I agree though that UCI is seemingly deep in the sh*t here, with a fair few senior people...

Where have you got that from or are you just guesing? USADA is an agency working under WADA rules. Lance waived his right to a hearing, so rule 8.3 applies: Waiver of Hearing The right to a hearing may be waived either expressly or by the Athlete’s or other Person’s failure to challenge an...

The French cycling authorities have come out today and stated that Lance's results should be left blank and that he pays back his prize money.

But what he was alleged to have taken (and what other retrospectively banned athletes took) was illegal then, is now, and forever shall be.

The easiest thing in the world would have been for Armstrong to say in that statement "I never doped", but he didn't. He has never said it. All he has said is that he was never caught. He is adopting the war criminal 'defence' of refusing to accept the jurisdiction of a body that has...