Search results

He didn't say muslims in the US he just said muslims, thats why I asked him if he would retract his stupid comment. yea and if you expanded the years to include 9/11 the propaganda would still be irrelevant. What you fail to grasp is the gun figures are stable, the attacks by Muslims are...

Whatyou said was that more Americans kil lpeople than muslims, nothing to do with the anti gun propaganda you posted(that data also includes suicides and police action). Try again, use your crayons if you like. Or maybe you wish to retract? Why not stay on topic, i see support for trump is...

Trump is like a breath of fresh air for a couple of reasons. Provides balance, he is at one extremeand those who say anyone should be allowed in are at the other.It helpsshift the spectrum. Which is why in part it drives the left batshit crazy. It draws their ire and allows sane reasonable...

I didn't say all muslims and kaffer refers to non-muslims.

Going to another country is not a right, they have the right to refuse you on any grounds. The truth is most people are now viewing muslims with apprehension at least, then on a scale towards suspension, dislike etc. Something muslims have always done towards kaffers.

The thing is, once the squealing of the left dies down a bit its usually followed by eye witnesses backing him up. This can only do him good.

This isn't true. Denial and making comfort noises wont save you.

Are you crying?

Arming for jihad/conquest, sadly not suprised.. Meanwhile in Australia. http://news.yahoo.com/ex-australia-pm-abbott-says-west-proclaim-superiority-022341256.html Of course are values are superior, thats why we choose to live by them.

Wecould say you are another Kale munching soft-cock,man baby who starts crying when you read something that scares you.

Punishing what 3 million? He said he would ban new entrants, that nearer a billion.

It was at the top of my facebook news feed. The problem is those who oppose trump on here have drifted far of the mainstream they've divorced from reason. Anypeople are entitled to decide the composition of their populace for whatever reason.

I do agree with a lot with what you say and especially the above. The points you overlook as those buffoons, right or wrong, need desperate times to get elected((Thatcher is an example) and people on here seriously underestimate how much targeted slaughter has scared the shit out of people...

Collapse of the Soviet Union had more to do with the failings of communism than anything Reagan said, although it may have helped them on the way by realising how clapped out their system was.

It is a policy of containment and does ramp things up. Its not just America thats drifting this way, Trump is just a vocal embodiment of it, the whole world is. Was watching a doc yesterday of the vioence in the Central African Republic and the Christians there havebegan to Organise and kick...

Wrong. We are dealing with Scale, scope and target.and how long taking an apologist approach remains politically tenable.

Ah, theold "you will only make things worse" argument None of that happened when President Carter banned Iranians and kicked out Iranian students http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/12/flashback-jimmy-carter-banned-iranians-from-us-deported-iranian-students-during-hostage-crisis/ But none

Yes you did. The point is a real and identifiable threat which the jews were not.

my thinking? No we are dealing with issues of scale. When 3 or 4 show up and kill dozens. Where a few hundred rape ,1000s of girls in Rotherham. we are not talking random murders but an ideological agenda with exponential growth potential.

: Yea because the Jews were planning on slaughtering people, radicalising and claiming they were going to conquor the west.:tosser: