Search results

But the evidence of the crime was only revealed I May 2010, so Labour was then in opposition. It would have still been going on, at HSBC had the whistleblower not blown the whistle

I like to see them in Court to answer for the crime of tax evasion that they have committed, or is it only benefits fraud that doesn't waste the courts time

I'd love to join in this conversation, but i went to a state school

If, as some on here insist, there is no offence being committed, why not just publish the names of all 7000 account holders? Jimmy Carr, Gary Barlow, etc all appeared to have an attack of conscious once they were held up to public scrutiny. Why aren't we told who these account holders are

One, it may well be all banks, but that doesn't make it right. Two, it is fiddling tax illegally that is the main thrust of this whistleblowers revalation,and prosecution are already taking place in other countries. If thes illegal and immoral practices are kept hidden as you aopear to want...

As I don't have an offshore bank account, I'm much more concerned that a major U.K. bank broke the law(again)and has appeared to get waway with it (again)

Tax? Surely thats only for the little people?