I'll try one last time with you.
You quoted an article about palaeodata - that involves going back through hundreds of thousand/millions of years using things such as ice cores (where the level of granularity is very low).
The charts have compared the projections from the climate models (as...
Fools go on about air quality and climate change, Air quality is NOT CO2. Only a complete retard would equate air quality to CO2. The change in CO2 since 1850 is (very roughly) 1 part in 10,000. Yep, that’s right 0.01% change in CO2 in the atmosphere from 0.0287% to 0.0405%. CO2 is an...
Oh dear.
Someone doesn't understand the difference between the models projections of the FUTURE (which fail) and then trying to map the models to the palaeodata (which is often produced by proxies so can only ever be an estimate).
1/10 - must try harder.
So, to make it really simple for you...
I’ve told you what to search for. You can find it yourself. It’s widely known (apart from dipsh1ts) that the models overstate warming compared to observations.
There’s this thing called a search engine which searches websites on the internet. I’ve heard that google is quite good (although...
Wow, you really don’t know that observations continually fall short of the models?
Jeez - tell you what Einstein, do yourself a favour and just google “climate models compared to observations”, then you can see the various charts. It’s really not that complicated.
Google yourself and find out if you're that bothered. There are multiple charts out there.
I'm just pointing out facts - no emotion.
Fact:
There are 5 global temperature datasets (so there is not one temperature).
The data is manipulated and not raw. (i.e. adjustments are made to 'compensate'...
I'm all for science so I am extremely surprised whenever I look at charts which compare the climate models to the observations. After all, it's the climate models which are used to predict the future and influence policy.
They continually run hot. You can see for yourself - search climate...
California has a history of mega-droughts. These can be forty odd years and in very extreme cases, have been calculated as a couple of centuries. So, if we accept that California has a history of prolonged dry spells, why would Californians (who are meant to be enlightened, climate aware...