Search results

Sorry, it was a copy and past from my earlier post. This does work. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/18/what-else-did-the-97-of-scientists-say/

First, thank you for the civil comments - unlike some on here. I posted this earlier on the thread. As you can see, I'm not disputing that there is a figure of 97%, but it's how that figure is achieved which makes it wrong in terms of the percentages...

He was a NASA scientist and still produces one of the 5 global temperature datasets, but hey-Ho, you read a comment from a poster on NSC and think that overrides the credentials of someone of that stature. Jeez, there really are some f***ing dicks on here who are so blinkered that they cannot...

He may well have done - I don't know about that. However, he is still responsible for producting one of the 5 global datasets on temperature. And, aligning himself to an organisation which in in tune with his beliefs on global warming is not so wrong is it? Just because they differ in their...

I honestly thought the Wiki title was quite clear. "List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming". My point is there are not an insignificant number of scientists who oppose, to varying levels, the doctrine of catastrophic man made global warming. If...

Here you go. See, you are criticising and you didn't even know it there had been a maximum sea ice extent. You know the sum total of f*** all. https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum And with that, I will not post on this again. You can't discuss...

I think my view is being misunderstood. I do agree that man emits Co2. I do agree that Co2 is a greehouse gas. However, I don't agree with the catastrophic man made global warming doctrine. There are many natural cycles within the earths climate system (AMO, PDO, level of cloud cover, etc)...

Fact : 2014 was the highest level of Antarctic sea ice ever recorded. Doesn't exactly fit with a warming planet.

You were an asswipe as nibble and yuo're still an asswipe. I don't bother to read any of your comments as you are totally irrelevant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming The scientists listed here are only those who have their own WIKI page. So, when I hear ordinary people saying the "science is settled" and there a numerous scientists who dispute...

Of dear, you are confusing the facts with the guesswork/assumptions. Fact : Antarctica is gaining more Ice Mass than it is losing. Assumption from NASA. This is because of global warming causing more snow. Like all of these assumptions from organisations such as the IPCC, they are guesswork...

Let me answer some of your points. 1. I accept that Man is emitting Co2. 2. The impact of out Co2 emissions in comparison to the natural Co2 cycle is quite small. 3. The effect of Co2 in terms of retaining heat is marginal. There are many more factors which the AGW activists dismiss out of...

Co2 is plant food. More Co2 is good for the planet. Co2 has been much higher in the past (7000 ppm) and the planet has never burn to a crisp. Slightly warmer temperatures wiould be good for the planet - cold is a much bigger killer than heat. I know you won't believe this and many won't as they...

Jesus Christ. How many more weasel words do you want to use to back your case? It states that Antarctic land ice is increasing, but, so he stays "on message" he caveats lots of stuff to maybe link this to globull warming. Oh, and the Western Peninsula is impacted by geothermal activity. Look...

I have no agenda. I don't disagree that there was a small increase in temperatures at the end of the last century. I don't dispute that CO2 has increased. However, all of the predictions about hurricanes/tornados/IPCC models etc have been wrong. The arctic has had times in the past (early in...

Karl et al (the recent NOAA 'pause-busting data) has been debunked as unreliable, failure to adhere to the NOAA standards and cannot be reproduced by others as the software and data have been lost! WTF. I know you're a tree-hugging, left-wing, green zealot, but try reading about the subject...

Hmm, appears that NASA doesn't agree with you. NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses and Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum...

I agree. But then the scientists should be polled anonymously with the freedom to speak their mind. There are numerous examples where people have spoken out against the doctrine of AGW and then lose funding/positions.

One example of the analysis of the 97% claim (note - nothing to do with the science, but the production of the 97% statistic which gets quoted). https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/18/what-else-did-the-97-of-scientists-say/ Sample from the article: I wonder just how many politicians or...

So yes, please carry on caring for the environment :)