Search results

And I agree with you. That wasn't the point I was making. I was challenging the poster's assumptions.

It doesn't. I am not commenting on the behaviour of any of the participants, or the rights or wrongs. I was commenting on the poster who said "The fella just said 2-1 mate". How does he know that? Would we view it differently if the fella had previously said something totally obnoxious and...

FFS. Why don't people ever read anything in context? I'm not defending him in any way whatsoever. I was just responding to the poster who said the fella had just said '2-1 mate'. We have no idea what happened before that.

Totally agree. Disgusting. However we don't know what had happened before. It could have been more than just '2-1 mate'.

Totally agree. I've no idea! I was just challenging other people's assumptions.

Carragher claims they had been taunting him before that though.

You were there were you? How on earth do you know that? Not defending him at all, but Carragher says he was continually taunted. I hope you're never selected for jury service.