Search results

Just wish all transfers were clear with no add ons and no undisclosed fees except selling on percentages.

What the sun wrote about regarding Hillsborough was reported to them by the police,I know they should of checked the reports out before going to press but it was the police that lied the sun just reported it.

As I said I hope Bozza is right but I'm just saying every outlet I have read or listened to report £2.5 m. We will probably never know the true figure but we still get at the minimum £2.5 m, but IMO I think he was worth £3.5 m but if Bozza is right then happy days.

Its just not the sun that have quoted £2.5m all the other papers say the same as do sky.I hope Bozza is right with the correct figure but why should I believe him over many other sources who most of the time are itk

I thought undisclosed was for either selling club undervalued player or buying club over paying for said player.

Every media outlet that I have read has it £2.5m I have not seen anything saying higher than that figure I hope to be proved wrong

We turn down original bid of 2m/2.5m + add ons hoping other clubs come in for LB, this didn't happen,we go back to Sunderland and say we accept original bid. Sunderland say no but will offer you £2.5m with no add ons,we are then stuck with a player who does not want to be here and will go for...