Search results

She lost. Good.

Not for me, Clive. Her crimes are unforgivable.

Anybody who has seen the documentary would take anything she says with a grain of salt; she is very manipulative and minimises her guilt at every opportunity.

Again, this is guesswork and hyperbole. What we do know is that the judiciary dismissed an appeal on this issue. Their reasons for doing so may be scrutinised in the future under FOIA requests, but for now there’s nothing more to be done.

Respectfully, you don’t know enough about the unpublished aspects of the case to come to that conclusion. If anything, the circumstantial evidence would suggest the opposite. The closed findings almost certainly tell the real story here of why UK intelligence believes she poses an actual risk...

She would also be arrested and held indefinitely on terrorism charges as an adult. People seem to think had this appeal been successful, she’d simply move here and be given a home. They’re right but that home would be a secure wing of a women’s prison, awaiting trial for what are very serious...

What do you think would be an appropriate outcome?

Is it not the case that this decision was made on the basis of security intelligence, that Begum still posed a threat to Britain? Without seeing that confidential evidence, weighing it against risk and making a decision as the home office have (presumably) done, we the public are in the dark...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64731007