He might get DIFFERENT criticism, but if the miss was a shocker I'd expect it to be called as such, yes.
"The guy is great at heading normally, but today he's put three very presentable chances all wide of the far post. (along with the keeper) He's cost us three points today"*
as opposed to...
I disagree. I appreciate the concept of the more reliable keeper being 'in credit', and thus being more easily forgiven for the mistake, but what actually happens is you get people trying to pretend it wasn't (that bad) a mistake at all. "He was impeded by the defenders. Not his fault".
Its...
Yes - you'll note, I actually said 'NEAR identical'. TK actually DID get there though, so he wasn't significantly impeded . He just completely missed the ball when he got there.
There's no need for anyone to get defensive on behalf of TK, in response to this thread. He's clearly a very good...
How on earth can you come to that conclusion? Utterly bizarre.
In both cases the keeper mis-judged the initial corner, came halfway , then retreated. In both cases there was a tame header back to the near post. In both cases the keeper could quite comfortably have got there and palmed the ball...
Not been on here since the match, so apologies if this has been done to death already, but I presume that, as the goal was near IDENTICAL to the one Brezovan conceded at Hull, that TK has been sentenced to eternal damnation in the same way??