Search results

I disagree. I think there are. Or least people who think that Dick did enough good for the club, that nothing he does or says now 'counts'.

Not of Utd's, no.

Is Ferguson's book critical of Man Utd's directors, then?

Of course they won't sell it. They are fascists. The Albion club shop under POL Barber is like North Korea. North Korean fascist nazi stock policy. Oh the drama.

Doesn't mean that there was no other reason, though, I'd guess. Even the above seems fair enough to me. If the directors of the club don't like the content why would anyone think that they would want to stock it? Like you've said though - they've done him a favour. He's getting reams of...

It's very, very clearly NOT 'the same thing'. If they had put their lawyers onto him to try to stop him releasing the book, or to to request changes to its content, then that would be getting into free speech territory. Choosing not to sell the book is absolutely nothing of the sort. Ridiculous.

We don't know yet if they are going to veto the share sale. If they intend to not allow it, that would be a very real reason not to stock the books / application forms.

Melodramatic bollocks as usual. They haven't banned the book, and they can not, and very obviously are not, infringing his right to 'free speech'. They are just not selling the thing in their shop. Nothing more, nothing less.

Or "Knight book scarce, as millions of copies given FREE to Romanians and benefit cheats"

That would have been "Dick Knight's book BANNED by the EU" Or possibly "Dick Knight's book gives you cancer"

Only in the Queens Road branch, that one.

Yes. Yes they are. By the same reckoning, Dick's book is BANNED by Pets at Home, and Starbucks, too.