Search results

Consumate Professional

202/5, and that's cakes.

Yes, yes it does. That will do nicely.

WW. The revised Mushy-meter is GOOD work. HOWEVER, cricket is all about TRADITION, not new-fangled rebranding excercises. I will use the new meter* if the majority are in favour. *minus the SHARKS badge. the Mushy meter deals only in CHAMPIONSHIP cricket. :thumbsup:

Lunch at the Rose Bowl should be a more satisfying affair this year for everybody, now that the FAT aussie isn't there eating all the buns.

Come on Mushy, lets have one more before LUNCHEON.

67/3

............

Bowling Mushy, Bowling.

Meanwhile the mighty Lancs continue to lull Slurrey into a false sense of security. Currently 265/2 with dancing boy, waltzing past his first century of the season. Please, please, please can we have him back in the England team?

He's not injured at all mate - read through the thread.

Slurrey 234/2 v MIGHTY Lancs Ramps 94* Butcher 80* My computer claims that Mahmood has bowled 14 overs for only 55 runs. I'd better call I.T.

332 a/o Mushy lbw Bond 1 Bond 7-66

331/9 Goodwin 121 :clap: Liddle 4* Mushy 0*

324/8 Goodwin 118* Liddle 0* Just Mushy to bat. Bond 6-59

Bond is RAPING our tail, so to speak.

It seems like we fancy bowling a few overs tonight :jester:

Well done to Gus Mackay [now THERE's something you don't read on here very often!] and Sussex for acting decisively when it became obvious there may be an issue over Harris. It would have been easy to bury our heads then say later we knew nothing [like West Ham]. I'd hate for us to have had to...

Bugger. Come on Tucker.

Snap