Search results

Ok, back from Tesco now so anything important happened? Has London Irish opened his eyes yet?

I'm about to have meetings with an global Plc regarding weekly supply shipments!

Would become a pretty dull forum!!!!

It's relevant when people bang on about 52% of the 'country' voted to leave. By all means say 52% of the vote was to leave but by saying the former it is trying to suggest that there was a clear majority of people living on this island that don't want to be part of the EU and that clearly is...

Well someone has to take the minutes!!!

Can't stand the bloke but in his defence, he was pretty impotent once Cameron had jumped ship.

Apologies for the insult but thought it was necessary. No need to guess about you! Have you now read and understood my post that you were commenting on?

Hello Mr Dumb!!! Read my post, there are not three options, there are two questions. You answer the first and then you answer the second. How hard is that to understand :facepalm:

Keep digging. I never said you had an emotional allegiance to any particular party. But it is clear you have hatred for Blair and therefore anything he is linked to. As far as myself and Blair, I take a pragmatic view that Labour, under the old guard, would never have been elected and we...

Well first of all, 52% of the country didn't vote leave, not even 52% of the electorate voted leave. Secondly, there was no clear mandate at the time as to what Brexit actually meant and what the various options were. There was never mention, as far as I can recall of Brexit on default WTO...

Pardon? Cryptic as ever.

Ha, and your opinion is unbiased and slanted against Blair. Where I have admitted be 'blinded' by my support of Blair and New Labour. You seem capable of putting spin on anything.

And that is the rub of it. Corbyn may well have 500k + members but that is not what will get him elected. He needs to attract the middle ground. Blair and his cronies realized that and achieved it. Foot and Kinnock didn't. It's not good having great ideals if you're not in power to enact them!

What does it matter from where he got the weapons, the fact is he had had them and used them. In his report to the UN on the 14th Feb 2003, Blix reported that they were overseeing the destruction of 50 litres of mustard gas (at that time a third of it had been destroyed) plus thiodiglycol, a...

Not going to try and pretend it has been plain sailing, far from it, but don't forget that Iraq invaded Kuwait before we got involved in the first gulf war and Al Qaeda was operating long before we went into Afghanistan which itself was before 9/11 and the attacks on the US embassies in Nairobi...

What did then? Or, do you not think it has changed?

You are talking utter garbage. Homelessness was around long before Blair and the Trussel Trust was founded in 1997, the year Labour were elected. In 2004 they only had two food banks in the uk (and let's be honest, prior to this there were other ways food was distributed although not well...

:facepalm:

He did and Blix was overseeing the destruction of what had been found. What we didn't know at the time was whether there was anymore that was hidden. He'd used them on the Kurds previously.

So, Gaddafi didn't supply arms to IRA terrorists that went on to bomb London, didn't protect the murderer of PC Fletcher, had nothing to do with Lockerbie. As for Saddam, I guess it's a myth about him starting a war with Iran or invading Kuwait, or using WMD on Kurds or the countless...