Agree - as we mostly stand anyway it doesn’t make much difference, other than being a bit more comfortable. If Palace had safe standing I wouldn’t have had bruised shins from piling over two rows when Maupay equalised :laugh:
Shift the away support from behind the goal and reconfigure parts of the South into safe standing, which will also be next to the away support, presumably in the SE or SW corner - sorted :thumbsup:
Part of it at least but need to delve deeper. As the above posts indicate, potentially looks like plenty of those objecting wouldn't even be affected.........virtually impossible though to have representative results - really need those who would have to move from the proposed safe standing...
I don’t really get the distaste tbh - it wouldn’t be compulsory, it would be a relatively small section in the NS (probably where most are already standing anyway) filled with only those who wanted it. It could have been presented differently - for example proposing say ‘the top half of 3 NS...
Me neither…….I was suggesting another question, and my point re cost was that anyone not wanting to stand and moving out the NS would almost certainly have to move into a higher cost ST block