Search results

Lots of free ones.....like this ? https://www.foxtext.com

Yup but I guess it’s easier for them not to have to. It’s not a fraction of a second though....phone rings, listen to a few rings, think about answering, decide not to, pick it up (possibly stretching, looking for it under the sunglasses, pile of sweet wrappers), unlock (possibly), then reject...

Fair point but if a copper sees someone with their phone in their hand, do they even need to know exactly what was happening at the time ? Much easier (and more strongly enforces the intended outcome - to stop people using the bloody things whilst driving) to essentially make ‘touching a mobile...

No, not as long as you don’t touch it.

Not as simple as ignoring it until you’ve stopped.

To use when they’re not driving ?

Stop digging fella. It’s his fault, 100%.

No, no he isn’t. He carries the NW gene.

You’ve lost me, what’s that got to do with tracking info ? Anyway, sending a text is barely any better - it’s still down to the person receiving it to choose what to do. Don’t touch the phone. Simple.

So everyone at the company he works for who might call him has access to real-time tracking ? Impressive stuff. Big brother has arrived.

.....and not drop your sandwich.

Why would the firm need to be compelled ? They wouldn’t know he was driving at that exact time. Simply don’t pick it up or answer it. Police can’t distinguish between some taking or rejecting a call, sending a text or playing candy crush if someone has a phone in their hands.