Search results

As im sure you and Buzzer are aware, all my comments were RESPONSES... If a load of people who normally show outage at people starting duplicate posts show up to insult me, well, sorry, i will respond. Both of you are doing the same shit. Stop derailing the thread.

Yes, I derailed a thread, by asking the OP why he started a second thread about the same person he was commenting on, in an ongoinng jihad john thread... terrrible stuff. Your faux rage is scary. Sorry. I apologise.

Really? I dont think so, and havnt thought so in the past, when people on NSC have rounded on posters for starting threads about issues when there are already ongoing threads in full flow. Apparently, its somewhat different if Im enquiring about it. Its funny.

Offended? Im not offended. Thats a little theatrical, and no need to apologise. Yes, youre right, I do not live in England. Sadly, im unable to access the same media as you, so you will know more about this issue. If only there was the internet.. All ive asked you, is why, when commenting on an...

**** off

Again...Dave thought, that as there was a 'Jihad John' thread, which was alive and up to page 5 that the OP of this thread was actually commenting in, then there probably wasnt much point in starting a second thread about the same individual, on the same page as the first, unless it was for a...

Yeah, for the crime of suggesting to the op that commenting in one thread about one named individual was probably enough, and he didnt have to really raise a second thread about the individual... If I get on the tis of pompous ***** like you...good. anyway Stop trying to derail this thread.

Stop trying to derail the thread. :lol:

Yeah, I could start a third thread about Jihadi John... Police visited his house...good reason for another thread I think, what you think?

:facepalm:

Derailing a thread? haha All I did was comment on the fact that the OP is enjoying a look at me moment, by starting a second thread on a subject... a subject he was commenting on, in the first and ongoing thread. The reaction is pretty funny.

Another thread about the same subject you mean? Which is all I commented on...but the 'usual suspects' felt a need to flap their gums about it. I would apologise, if I felt a needed to.

No, Dave responds to schoolyard insults with schoolyard insults. If I had been commenting on a thread about an individual, then opened another thread that concerns that same individual, im fairly sure the 'usual' suspects would be flapping their gums about it. Its ok. Its quite funny.

What? like going to look for people to fight? Multiple times?

I have nothing to deal with? Pointing out a 'look at me' merchant is not a big deal. Only you and DR seem to think so. Youre special.. HAHA I guess your family have to deal with it.

So, youre seriously going to say its nothing about 'Jihad John', and couldnt have gone on the same 5 page thread that the OP has been commenting on. psst.....the clue is in the post. 'Guess who the research director of the LONDON based human rights group CAGE is referring to'.

It means you recognise your title as wanker. We both know that If I had opened a thread about a UKIP individual, when there was already a five page thread on that individual, you would be 'commenting' on it. So feel free to do one.

Nobody is changing the subject... If there was a thread about a UKIP individual on page 1 of NSC that was up to five pages long, that I had been commenting on, and I then opened a second thread about the same individual, you would be one of the first wankers to flap your gums about it. As you...

Good to see you recognise your name.

Not concerning the same fecking individual on a directly linked thread, on which the OP is already posting on. Thanks for your advice as well wanker.