My issue with your hypothesis is my experience working in the media industry especially back around the 2000s. Even if the behaviour wasn't "illegal" (or wouldn't pass a threshold even now) it deserves to be exposed..
.. but to who ?
There weren't functioning HR departments as we know them...
It really really wasn't. What were the producers supposed to do, omit the section because it involved Savile ? Nonsense.
It was just another example of the creepy behaviour on screen and on air which the programme was full of.
What we found out about Savile later was irrelevant. Savile was...
Like Savile never happened.
I have no idea whether he is guilty of anything that was said. What I do know of is that "new lad" era in media industry and the reluctance of anyone to make a complaint.
There is also a very high bar to getting any conviction in court.
In any case, the man has...
Then the story never gets told, because nobody complains. It's an industry who know little or nothing about.
Let me tell you something, no-one who works in the media industry will be surprised that there is yet another expose about an individual.
Such individuals have very powerful lawyers...
Firstly you have no idea whether anyone did contact the Police and secondly it's an environment if you know nothing about. A lot of the late 90s / early 2000s in that industry was utterly rotten.
If you think for one second this programme was the result of people "ringing up channel four" you...
This isn't a tabloid headline. This is an investigation that has taken place over many years.
You are barking up the wrong tree here and drawing false comparisons.
Dispatches and the Times wouldn't be dare going to press if they felt they didn't have something.
The problem is people don't complain through fear of losing their job or being edged out.
It's an environment I've worked in almost my entire career, usually regarding much lesser behaviour but...