Search results

No, not after today.

But that's not my point. I'm simply highlighting the fact that the church doesn't own the definition of marriage and hasn't done for years. It's really time for religious zealots of all religions to accept that fact I'm afraid or at least be consistent. It's somewhat hypocritical to disagree...

Then I don't understand why they don't campaign for the repeal of the 1836/1949 Marriage Acts as well. Long gone are the days when the only definition of a marriage was defined by the church.

On balance the court got it right, but then again I'm not sure anyone was forcing their beliefs on any one else. The problem now is that would still be illegal for the bakers to refuse to make a cake for a gay wedding, but leaves a very grey area as to what they able legally obliged to write on...