Search results

It's hardly "ridiculous" - more a subject for debate. How on earth can someone judge a goalkeeper with 6.5 who had nothing to do. It says absolutely nothing about how they are communicating with their defence, or what has gone on the week before to enable the goalkeeper to have "nothing to do"...

Always find it bizarre people rate goalkeepers low because they had nothing to do. Either start from ten and deduct points for mistakes or don't rate at all as the sensible RM Taylor has done. Where does a 6.5 come from for a quiet day ?