Search results

I agree with all of that as well.

The Argus has decided not to allow its readers to comment on that article.

There are a team of volunteer moderators, this has been flagged to them and legal issues for example are locked down , rightly , within minutes and other important issues are often dealt with promptly (racism, homophobia, trolling etc) . I think its more urgent than most of the back and forth...

NSC closes or locks threads all the time and has a team of very fine (volunteer) moderators who intervene for multiple reasons. Its very achievable and in my view the moderators might have done so because of the risk of inviting abuse but its a fine line and i respect their decision. The person...

That’s up to them. (And many do lock down discussions like this if reported) but This is NSC and you clearly think it’s ok - I don’t.

Not sure why the mods have allowed this thread. The lad involved is a vulnerable 17 year old. And there should be a duty of care regardless of what he /hasn’t done.