How do you know he's "not good enough for us" and I suspect the reason he's on trial at Watford is because he and his agent want him to play for a Premier League Club who play premier league wages.
Blimey Icy. 21 players out of our current 25 man squad would be on their way ?.
You'd keep 3 or 4 players, sell the rest and buy another 20 !!!
Of course we will.*
*we won't.
yes. we'll see and many agree with you, including myself. Its a big risk.
but its the other stuff you insist upon:
1. The club think - "the entire market isn't worth it."
2 [Bids for Calleri and other players] doesn't mean "the club has the money"
Both nonsense so why do you keep peddling...
I've no idea. But from this quote i interpreted it as the club not willing to over-pay for players that won't strengthen the squad "just to add numbers" but willing to pay on players that would.
The type of bids rumoured on here from good sources and of course Pritchard indicate that this is...
"we will only spend money on players that strengthen our group, and in an over-heated market we won't over-pay for alternatives that simply don't meet this objective and would just be a case of adding numbers. "...
Barber said he negotiated with Daniel Levy for 4-5 days to get a deal and they'd targeted him months before so hardly "pitched in at the last minute"
Given they'd agreed a £7m fee for Pritchard - I'd call that a serious move for "anyone" - what do you think they were doing if not that ?
Hemed, Knockeart and our attacking options were picking up more points, 12 more goals in (in 1 fewer game) than Boro in the same period.
Here's the table from end of January and the end of the transfer window
Barber actually said this SB. He didn't say we weren't prepared to "over pay" , just that we weren't prepared to over pay for "numbers" who wouldn't "strengthen" the squad.
Not sure what other agenda you think they have.
PS:What happened to your vow of silence on this particular matter?
"we...