Search results

He didn't do a lot wrong for the first, Whittingham shouldn't have been passed on by Sidwell. It was a superbly taken goal and Dunk was not at fault IMO. The second goal absolutely he tried to get tight/put a challenge in and he got beaten far too easily. 3rd goal again I can't make a case for...

The point I'm making if it had of been anyone other than Baldock you would have given them a higher mark than zero. I can't deny your point he was largely anonymous, I can only recall one touch which was just after he came on. If it were Wilson or Lua Lua I guarantee a Mark of 3 or above would...

Another one with an agenda. You truly believe Dunk was 2 marks worse than Goldson, Knockeart & Zamora? Those 3 were three of our weakest performers by a distance. It's all opinions but the point of this thread is to mark subjectively and not to try and add weight to previous threads/arguments.

Whilst Crofts wasn't fantastic, he really put in a shift yesterday. He probably won't be with us next season but for sheer hard work and the fact he kept possession c. 90% of the time albeit sideways and back I do fee it's harsh to mark him below 5, I can only guess people marking on...

Confirmation if we needed any that you have an agenda against Baldock. Give it up, if you don't rate him fair enough but to suggest he was worse than Stockdale makes no sense to me.

Stockdale - 3 Bruno - 5 Calderon - 4 Dunk - 5.5 Goldson - 4 Stephens - 5 Sidwell - 4 Crofts - 6 Knockeart - 4 Skalak - 6.5 Zamora - 4.5 Rosenior - 5 Hemed - 5 Baldock - 5