Search results

Kevin Keegan once had a philosophy that if you score more than the opposition you won't lose. Playing with CMS on his own up front with limited support from a pedestrian midfield ain't the way to play IMO. I don't mind losing, but I'd like to see us at least throw people forward when we...

Yh agreed, nothing wrong with any formation, any style, but, it should suit the type of players you have, not the other way around.

The difference is that those teams you mention have players who are up and down the pitch for 90 with pace.

There's definitely an element of this too. Good post. It goes back to the point that lots of posters have rightly pointed out, we just haven't replaced quality players with quality players. Cash in your best players by all means but have a plan to replace them with quality too.

Yup, and it's been like that for a while now. As Simmo points out, holla doesn't have the legs/unwilling to be the box to box type required. Having ince as the DM is fine and his displays recently have been very good. We don't need a second sitting midfielder alongside him. One thing I did...

This isn't something that's been introduced for this game. We have been playing with 2 DM's for months now. It's clearly a negative way to play unless you have the legs in there to support the front players when we break.

Been saying this for months. Good post